-
Reviews
Back to Reviews
Submited on: 01 Dec 2015 04:05:44 PM GMT
Published on: 02 Dec 2015 05:47:20 AM GMT
-
What are the main claims of the paper and how important are they?
NA
-
Are these claims novel? If not, please specify papers that weaken the claims to the originality of this one.
NA
-
Are the claims properly placed in the context of the previous literature?
Yes
-
Do the results support the claims? If not, what other evidence is required?
Yes
-
If a protocol is provided, for example for a randomized controlled trial, are there any important deviations from it? If so, have the authors explained adequately why the deviations occurred?
No
-
Is the methodology valid? Does the paper offer enough details of its methodology that its experiments or its analyses could be reproduced?
Yes
-
Would any other experiments or additional information improve the paper? How much better would the paper be if this extra work was done, and how difficult would such work be to do, or to provide?
Comparion with aother treatment modality
-
Is this paper outstanding in its discipline? (For example, would you like to see this work presented in a seminar at your hospital or university? Do you feel these results need to be incorporated in your next general lecture on the subject?) If yes, what makes it outstanding? If not, why not?
NA
-
Other Comments:
NA
-
Competing interests:
.
-
Invited by the author to review this article? :
Yes -
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
-
References:
None -
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
NA
- How to cite: Anonymous.Crossed steinmenn pin fixation for supracondylar femoral fractures[Review of the article 'Crossed Steinmann Pin Fixation In Supracondylar Femur Fractures In Adults A Case Series ' by Jindal M].WebmedCentral 2015;6(12):WMCRW003263
Crossed Steinmann Pin Fixation In Supracondylar Femur Fractures ,an accepted surgical procedure in children may be practiced in adults with acceptable results.
Orthopedists have been resorting to modified procedures ,but without published evidence.
Yes
Though the series is understandably small , greater number would lend more credence.
No
Acceptable tho' debatable.
Larger series , comparative , randomized studies may be of help.
It's different . New in its own way
A well written article , might impove with good editing , deleting repetitions etc
.
Yes
No
.
Orthopedic surgical and academic experience of over 25 years.