What are the main claims of the paper and how important are they?
None
Are these claims novel? If not, please specify papers that weaken the claims to the originality of this one.
yes
Are the claims properly placed in the context of the previous literature?
Refences are missing in fourth paragraph
Do the results support the claims? If not, what other evidence is required?
None
If a protocol is provided, for example for a randomized controlled trial, are there any important deviations from it? If so, have the authors explained adequately why the deviations occurred?
None
Is the methodology valid? Does the paper offer enough details of its methodology that its experiments or its analyses could be reproduced?
None
Would any other experiments or additional information improve the paper? How much better would the paper be if this extra work was done, and how difficult would such work be to do, or to provide?
none
Is this paper outstanding in its discipline? (For example, would you like to see this work presented in a seminar at your hospital or university? Do you feel these results need to be incorporated in your next general lecture on the subject?) If yes, what makes it outstanding? If not, why not?
None
Other Comments:
none
Competing interests: .
Invited by the author to review this article? : Yes
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
yes
How to cite: Lakshmanan I .A brief overview of the role of CA 15.3 in breast cancer [Review of the article 'A brief overview of the role of CA 15.3 in breast cancer ' by Una Cidon E].WebmedCentral 2017;8(7):WMCRW003364
None
yes
Refences are missing in fourth paragraph
None
None
None
none
None
none
.
Yes
No
None
yes