Submited on: 20 Nov 2010 01:59:55 AM GMT
Published on: 20 Nov 2010 02:01:07 AM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? No
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This manuscript is informative, timely and well-written.  It will be useful to researchers who consider entering the field.

    I strongly encourage this frontier of science for search of effects of positive static charge and thus appreciate the effort of the authors in carrying out this work.


  • Competing interests:
    No, I have not any competing interests to declare.
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
    Cerium oxide nanoparticles: a promise for applications in therapy. Celardo I, Traversa E, Ghibelli L. J Exp Ther Oncol. 2011;9(1):47-51.
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I am studying the capability of cerium oxide nanoparticles to alter the intracellular oxidative balance. I have not any experience about the effects of ambient electric charge, but I have good experience on the oxidative stress and its alteration in biological systems

  • How to cite:  I C .Effects Of Ambient Electric (static) Charge On Biological Systems[Review of the article 'Effects Of Ambient Electric (static) Charge On Biological Systems ' by Ocone L].WebmedCentral 2011;2(3):WMCRW00532
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse