Submited on: 22 Mar 2011 07:38:05 PM GMT
Published on: 23 Mar 2011 08:44:44 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    An apparent chalange for collaboration which can benifit knowledge and management of Alzemers' disease.

  • Competing interests:
    none
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Assisting in rehabilitation

  • How to cite:  Thompson B .Understanding Dementia; Management.................................................................[Review of the article 'Comprendre La Dmence: Gestion, Traitement Et Recherche Au R.-U. [UnderStanding Dementia: Management, Treatment and Research in the UK. French-English Presentation and Podcast for Use with Students and Professionals ' by Thompson S].WebmedCentral 2011;2(7):WMCRW00850
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    A great article and podcast

  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Clinical Researcher

  • How to cite:  Chinnery H .Understanding Dementia: Management, Treatment and Research in the UK. French-English Presentation and Podcast for use with Students and Professionals[Review of the article 'Comprendre La Dmence: Gestion, Traitement Et Recherche Au R.-U. [UnderStanding Dementia: Management, Treatment and Research in the UK. French-English Presentation and Podcast for Use with Students and Professionals ' by Thompson S].WebmedCentral 2011;2(5):WMCRW00762
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Comprendre ...
Posted by Ms. Natalie Jones on 15 May 2011 08:43:11 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Excellent presentation which will be useful for colleagues across Europe.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Assisting in rehabilitation.

  • How to cite:  Jones N .Comprendre ...[Review of the article 'Comprendre La Dmence: Gestion, Traitement Et Recherche Au R.-U. [UnderStanding Dementia: Management, Treatment and Research in the UK. French-English Presentation and Podcast for Use with Students and Professionals ' by Thompson S].WebmedCentral 2011;2(5):WMCRW00746
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse