Submited on: 11 Mar 2011 06:48:21 AM GMT
Published on: 11 Mar 2011 10:26:56 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    It is a very nicepaper an will help the readers to improver  their performance in nursing education

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I am a nurse educator.

  • How to cite:  Azizi E .Traditional Lectures, Socratic Method and Student Lectures: Which One do the Students Prefer?[Review of the article 'Traditional Lectures, Socratic Method and Student Lectures: Which One do the Students Prefer? ' by Aghajani M].WebmedCentral 2011;2(5):WMCRW00789
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Review
Posted by Dr. Efat Aminoroayaee on 07 May 2011 12:40:11 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    -

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    i an a teacher for 18 years.

  • How to cite:  Aminoroayaee E .Review[Review of the article 'Traditional Lectures, Socratic Method and Student Lectures: Which One do the Students Prefer? ' by Aghajani M].WebmedCentral 2011;2(5):WMCRW00733
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Review
Posted by Dr. Fatemeh Sadat Izadi avanji on 27 Apr 2011 05:14:35 AM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? No
  • Other Comments:

    6- i suggest that the authors add some reviwe about the iranian academic context.

    11- i suggest to omit the word anxiety from keywords.

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    Yes
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I am a lecturer in nursing education for more than 10 years

  • How to cite:  Izadi avanji F .Review[Review of the article 'Traditional Lectures, Socratic Method and Student Lectures: Which One do the Students Prefer? ' by Aghajani M].WebmedCentral 2011;2(4):WMCRW00704
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse