Submited on: 27 May 2011 03:11:52 PM GMT
Published on: 27 May 2011 06:42:37 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This work is old

  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    Yes
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    More than 10 years

  • How to cite:  Nasr El Deen N A.Antimicrobial Resistance and Phylogenetic Groups of Commensal Escherichia Coli Isolates from Healthy Pigs in Grenada [Review of the article 'Antimicrobial Resistance and Phylogenetic Groups of Commensal Escherichia Coli Isolates from Healthy Pigs in Grenada ' by Hariharan H].WebmedCentral 2011;2(6):WMCRW00800
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse