Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?
Yes
2
Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?
Yes
3
Is this a new and original contribution?
Yes
4
Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?
Yes
5
Are structure and length satisfactory?
Yes
6
Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?
No
7
Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?
No
8
Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?
Yes
9
Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?
No
10
Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?
Yes
11
Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?
Yes
Other Comments:
9. In my opinion no illustrations are necessary in that kind of review. The scope of the article is a general approach to the current thoughts about management of colorectal cancer liver metastasis.
Invited by the author to review this article? : Yes
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
A great amount of such cases has been managed in our surgical department
How to cite: Baltatzis M .Comments on [Review of the article 'Current Surgical Management of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A Mini Review ' by Sakantamis A].WebmedCentral 2011;2(10):WMCRW00987
9. In my opinion no illustrations are necessary in that kind of review. The scope of the article is a general approach to the current thoughts about management of colorectal cancer liver metastasis.
Yes
No
None
A great amount of such cases has been managed in our surgical department