Submited on: 29 Sep 2011 01:06:46 PM GMT
Published on: 30 Sep 2011 11:58:01 AM GMT
Comments on
Posted by Dr. Minas Baltatzis on 03 Oct 2011 09:07:54 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? No
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    9. In my opinion no illustrations are necessary in that kind of review. The scope of the article is a general approach to the current thoughts about management of colorectal cancer liver metastasis.

  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    A great amount of such cases has been managed in our surgical department

  • How to cite:  Baltatzis M .Comments on [Review of the article 'Current Surgical Management of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A Mini Review ' by Sakantamis A].WebmedCentral 2011;2(10):WMCRW00987
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse