Case Report
 

By Dr. Simon B Thompson , Mr. Shiguang Yang
Corresponding Author Dr. Simon B Thompson
Psychology Research Centre , Bournemouth University, - United Kingdom BH12 5BB
Submitting Author Dr. Simon B Thompson
Other Authors Mr. Shiguang Yang
Bournemouth University, - United Kingdom

GERIATRIC MEDICINE

Combat Stress; General Practice; Geriatriac Medicine; Japanese POWs; Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder; Prisoner of War; PTSD; Stress; Trauma; War Trauma

Thompson SB, Yang S. Prisoner Of War Patients With Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Growing Demand On Our Services? A Brief Case Study. WebmedCentral GERIATRIC MEDICINE 2011;2(2):WMC001619
doi: 10.9754/journal.wmc.2011.001619
No
Submitted on: 25 Feb 2011 10:55:24 AM GMT
Published on: 25 Feb 2011 10:26:24 PM GMT

Abstract


Increasingly, I have seen a number of English patients who were ex-POWs from Japanese camps. They are intriguing because of the apparent delay in onset of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

Introduction


During World War II there were over 140 000 prisoners in Japanese camps (Kakodate, Sendai, Tokyo, Nagoya, Hiroshima, Fukuoda, Osaka), Taiwan, Singapore, other Japanese-occupied countries. Camps housed military personnel and civilians who had been in the East before the outbreak of war. The Geneva Convention was ignored and rules included frequent punishments. One in 3 died from starvation, work, punishments or diseases for which there were no medicines.

 

Case study


Recently, I saw Mr P, in his 80s, happily married of 50 years with three children and several grandchildren. He was fairly quiet, mild-mannered but had periods of low mood going for long walks to “walk it off”. Increasingly, he was prone to fits of anger. A minor car accident had made him wildly admonish the driver to the embarrassment of his passenger wife. This signalled the beginning of a worrying new trait in which he showed more apparently “aggressive” outbursts.
Typical DSM-IV PTSD criteria (APA, 1995) signs were noted: nightmares, “night sweats”, and flashbacks. However, only now was any connection made with his distant and dark past. Over time with cognitive behavioural therapy, he confronted his past and the meaning behind his actions. Re-interpreting events, he found eventual solace in his eldest grandchildren showing great interest in recording events he described using a tape recorder.

Discussion & Conclusions


I suspect the symptoms of many ex-POWs remain unrecognised because of subtle or masked symptoms (Thompson, 2006) or only surface because of another trauma as in the case of this patient’s minor road traffic accident. I have seen several such cases though sadly from this era they will become scarcer due to their age.
Long periods of psychological suffering often accompany the legacy of recurring and debilitating physical conditions with ex-POWs. Some have ended their poor quality of life. Many survive due to incredible resilience and strong will-power. This carries them through great physical and psychological struggle which forces us to think again about the difficulty in recognising delayed onset and more subtle PTSD symptoms and how this impacts on our treatment intervention. There will be many more patients coming through from the recent Iraqi conflicts. As professional, we need to be aware of the multi-faceted problems associated with PTSD symptoms.

References


APA – American Psychiatric Association (1995). – Diagnostic & Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). 4th edition, Arlington, USA: American Psychiatric Association.
Thompson, S.B.N. (2006). Dementia and Memory: A Handbook for Students and Professionals, Aldershot: Ashgate.

Source(s) of Funding


Ethical approval - not applicable; Source of funding - none.

Competing Interests


Competing interests - none.

Disclaimer


This article has been downloaded from WebmedCentral. With our unique author driven post publication peer review, contents posted on this web portal do not undergo any prepublication peer or editorial review. It is completely the responsibility of the authors to ensure not only scientific and ethical standards of the manuscript but also its grammatical accuracy. Authors must ensure that they obtain all the necessary permissions before submitting any information that requires obtaining a consent or approval from a third party. Authors should also ensure not to submit any information which they do not have the copyright of or of which they have transferred the copyrights to a third party.
Contents on WebmedCentral are purely for biomedical researchers and scientists. They are not meant to cater to the needs of an individual patient. The web portal or any content(s) therein is neither designed to support, nor replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Your use of the WebmedCentral site and its contents is entirely at your own risk. We do not take any responsibility for any harm that you may suffer or inflict on a third person by following the contents of this website.

Comments
0 comments posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.

 

Author Comments
0 comments posted so far

 

What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
Where
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)