Original Articles
 

By Dr. Muddanahalli R Harish , Dr. B M Shashikumar
Corresponding Author Dr. Muddanahalli R Harish
Dermatology,Venereology and Leprosy,Mandya Istitute Of Medical Sciences,Mandya,Karnataka state,India, - India 570023
Submitting Author Dr. Muddanahalli R Harish
Other Authors Dr. B M Shashikumar
Department of Dermatology, Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, - India

DERMATOLOGY

Cross sectional study, Chronic renal failure, Hemodialysis, Cutaneous dermatosis, Mucocutaneous, Xerosis

Harish MR, Shashikumar BM. A Descriptive Cross Sectional Study to Determine Mucocutaneous Manifestations in Chronic Renal Failure on Hemodialysis. WebmedCentral DERMATOLOGY 2012;3(4):WMC003283
doi: 10.9754/journal.wmc.2012.003283

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
No
Submitted on: 21 Apr 2012 10:09:07 AM GMT
Published on: 21 Apr 2012 11:07:54 AM GMT

Abstract


Background: Cutaneous involvement in chronic renal failure (CRF) is characterized by a diversity of manifestations. Hemodialysis in CRF improves the quality of life and prolongs the life expectancy of the patients, giving time for newer cutaneous manifestations to develop which are becoming more common.
Aim: The aim of this study is to describe prevalence of cutaneous manifestations in chronic renal failure patients on hemodialysis.
Methods: It was a cross sectional study conducted over a period of 1year at tertiary hospital in south India. Seventy patients of CRF who were on regular hemodialysis for a period of atleast 4 months were examined for cutaneous involvement.
Results: Among the Seventy cases examined, male to female ratio was found to be 2.7:1. Mean duration of hemodialysis was 28.0 ± 9.0 months. Average dermatological manifestation per patient was found to be 3.6. In our study, xerosis and pruritus were the most common dermatological manifestation followed by skin discolouration. Other manifestations noted were Infection 30(42.9), Pallor 20(28.6), Acquired Perforating Dermatoses 5(7.1), Contact dermatitis 2(2.9), Lichen planus 1(1.4), Half and half nail 32(45.7), Splinter hemorrhage 1(1.4), Hair loss-leg 8(11.4), Brittle and lusterless hair 2(2.9).
Conclusions: Cutaneous manifestation though mostly non specific are fairly common in patients of CRF on hemodialysis.

Introduction


Chronic renal failure (CRF) is the slow loss of kidney function over time. Cutaneous involvement in chronic renal failure is characterized by a diversity of manifestations, which may be related to the process that causes kidney failure, the uremic state or the therapeutic measures used in their handling.[1] Therapeutic measures like hemodialysis, peritoneal dialyses and solid organ transplantation of patients with CRF improves the quality of life and prolongs the life expectancy of these patients, giving time for newer cutaneous manifestations to develop which are becoming more common.
Hemodialysis is a technique that allows removal of metabolic waste products from CRF patients. Although it is effective in prolonging the survival of these patients, persistent metabolic alterations and the risk of the dialysis procedure results in continued morbidity, skin changes associated with it and dialysis may cause discomfort to the patients.[2] Hence, this present study was undertaken to study the association of cutaneous manifestation in CRF patients on Hemodialysis.

Aims and objectives


To study the cutaneous manifestations in chronic renal failure patients on hemodialysis.

Materials and Methods


This cross sectional study was conducted over a period of 1year at tertiary hospital in south India. Seventy patients of CRF who were on regular hemodialysis for a period of atleast 4 months were included in the study after obtaining their informed consent. Patients with clinical manifestations prior to diagnosis of CRF were not included in the study. Patients who discontinued treatment within 3 months were excluded from the study. Patients were examined with detailed history, physical examination with a special emphasis on cutaneous, mucosal and nail involvement. Specific investigations like skin biopsy, culture and sensitivity for bacterial infections, Gram's stain, potassium hydroxide mount and fungal culture were done for the confirmation of diagnosis in doubtful situation. Results were tabulated and analyzed using Chi-square test and other relevant statistical test.

Results


A total of seventy cases were included in this study which comprises of 51 males and 19 female and male to female ratio was 2.7:1. Mean age was 47±13 years (youngest 18 years female and oldest 60years male) and mean duration of hemodialysis was 28.0 ± 9.0 months. In most instances multiple dermatological manifestation were encountered in the same patient with an average of 3.6 manifestations per patient. The numbers of patients showing 3 or more manifestations were 40 patients (57.1%), 2 manifestations were seen in 21 patients (30%) and only 1 manifestation was seen in 9 patients (12.9%). Xerosis and pruritus were most frequently observed dermatoses accounting to one half of all the dermatoses observed in the study. Various cutaneous manifestations observed in our study are shown in Illustration 1.

Discussion


Xerosis was the most common dermatoses, seen in 58 patients (82.9%) and the comment site being lower limbs and flanks. Prevalence of xerosis in patients of CRF on hemodialysis ranged from 46-90%.[3,4,5] and also in Indian study by Udayakumar et al it was 79% which is well comparable with our study. 12% of these patients had severe xerosis and 80% of them complained of associated moderate to severe itching. Pruritus, the most annoying and commonest symptoms present in 56(80%) of patients. Different reports indicate the prevalence of pruritus in the hemodialysis patients to be 19% to 90%.[2,6-11] also, severe itching was present in 60% of patients, moderate in 12% and mild in 28%. There was no correlation in severity of itching and hemodialysis.
Skin discoloration was seen in 55 (78.6%) patients. Hyperpigmentation of palms and soles (30%) was common than the diffuse pigmentation (20%) and pallor of the skin was noted in 20(28.6%). Frequency of skin discoloration reported in various studies were 20- 80% [2,3,6-8] which is similar to our study. Hyperpigmented macules on the palms and soles have been reported by Pico et al. and are also attributed to increased circulating b-MSH[6] and increase in melanin in the basal layer and superficial dermis due to failure of the kidneys to excrete beta-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (b-MSH).[6,12] Pallor is due to the associated anaemia due to renal failure.
Pico et al [6] reported infections in 70% of the patients and in Indian study by Udayakumar et al it was 40%.[2] In present study it was 42.9% which is similar to other Indian study. Most common infection was fungal infection noted in 20 (28.6%), mainly tinea cruris (8,11.4%)  followed candidal intertrigo(6,8.6%) . Acquired Perforating Dermatosis has been reported to occur in 4.5-17% of patients on hemodialysis.[4,6,13] In present study it was 7.1%. Other dermatosis noted were contact dermatitis (2, 2.9) and lichen planus (1, 1.4)
Common nail changes described in CRF are Lindsay's nails (half and half nails), subungual hyperkeratosis, onycholysis, Mees' lines (7%), Muehrcke's lines, splinter haemorrhages, Beau's lines and brown nail bed arcs.[2] Frequency of nail changes, excluding onychomycosis, was around 66% to 79% in various studies.[6-8,14] In our study we noted Half and half nail in 32(45.7%) and Splinter hemorrhage in 1 (1.4%).
Common hair changes described in CRF are sparse body hair and diffuse alopecia with dry, lustreless hair in various studies. Brittle and lustreless hair was seen in 47% in study by Sultan MM et al [15] and 16% in Udayakumar et al. Sparse body hair was seen in 27% in study by Sultan MM et al and 30% in Udayakumar et al. In contrast to the above study, in our study brittle and lustreless hair and sparse body hair was seen in 2(2.9%) and 8(11.4%) respectively.

Conclusion


Careful examination of the skin, hair nails and mucous membrane provides important clues to the diagnosis of complications in chronic renal failure patients on hemodialysis. Cutaneous manifestation though mostly non specific are fairly common in patients of CRF on hemodialysis. Further studies high lighting the etiopathogenesis of cutaneous markers of CRF are needed.

References


1. Gerhardt, Clarissa Morais Busatto et al. Skin diseases in hemodialysis and kidney transplant patients. J. Bras. Nefrol. [online]. 2011, vol.33, n.2 [cited  2012-04-20], pp. 268-275.
2. Udayakumar P, Balasubramanian S, Ramalingam KS, Lakshmi C, Srinivas CR, Mathew AC. Cutaneous manifestations in patients with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2006;72:119-25.
3. Morton CA, Lafferty M, Hau C, Henderson I, Jones M, Lowe JG. Pruritus and skin hydration during dialysis. Nephron Dial Transplant 1996;11:2031-6.
4. Tawade N, Gokhale BB. Dermatologic manifestation of chronic renal failure. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 1996;62:155-6.
5. Siddappa K, Nair BK, Ravindra K, Siddesh ER. Skin in systemic disease. In: Valia RG, Valia AR, editors. IADVL Textbook and atlas of dermatology. 2nd ed. Bhalani Publishing House: Mumbai; 2000. p. 938-84.
6. Picó MR, Lugo-Somolinos A, Sánchez JL, Burgos-Calderón R. Cutaneous alterations in patients with chronic renal failure. Int J Dermatol. 1992;31:860-3.
7. Yaghubi R, Niloufar S, Latifee S M. Cutaneous manifestations of end stage renal disease under hemodialysis. Iran J Dermatol. 2002;5:29-34.
8. Naderi N, Mahdavi-Mazdeh M, Firouz A, Heydari Seraj M. Cutaneous manifestations of end stage renal disease under hemodialysis in hemodialysis ward at Imam Khomeini hospital in Tehran in 2003. Iran J Dermatol. 2005;6:489-95.
9. Szepietowski JC, Sikora M, Kusztal M, Salomon J, Magott M, Szepietowski T. Uremic pruritus: a clinical study of maintenance hemodialysis patients. J Dermatol. 2002;29:621-7.
10. Gupta AK, Gupta MA, Cardella CJ, Haberman HF. Cutaneous associations of chronic renal failure and dialysis. Int J Dermatol. 1986;25:498-504.
11. Zucker I, Yosipovitch G, David M, Gafter U, Boner G. Prevalence and characterization of uremic pruritus in patients undergoing hemodialysis: uremic pruritus is still a major problem for patients with end-stage renal disease. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49:842-6.
12. Smith AG, Shuster S, Thody AJ, Alvarez-Ude F, Kerr DN. Role of the kidney in regulating plasma immunoreactive beta-melanocyte stimulating hormone. Br Med J 1976;1:874-6.
13. Heilman ER, Friedman RJ. Degenerative diseases and perforating disorders. In: Elder D, Elenitsas R, Jaworsky C, Johnson Jr. B, editors. Lever's histopathology of the skin. 8th ed. Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia; 1997. p. 341-51.
14. Saray Y, Seçkin D, Güleç AT, Akgün S, Haberal M. Nail disorders in hemodialysis patients and renal transplant recipients: a case-control study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50:197-202.
15. Sultan MM, Mansour HH, Wahby IM, Houdery AS.Cutaneous manifestations in Egyptian patients with chronic renal failure on regular hemodialysis. J Egypt Women Dermatol Soc. 2010;7:49-55.

Source(s) of Funding


Nil

Competing Interests


No conflict of interest

Disclaimer


This article has been downloaded from WebmedCentral. With our unique author driven post publication peer review, contents posted on this web portal do not undergo any prepublication peer or editorial review. It is completely the responsibility of the authors to ensure not only scientific and ethical standards of the manuscript but also its grammatical accuracy. Authors must ensure that they obtain all the necessary permissions before submitting any information that requires obtaining a consent or approval from a third party. Authors should also ensure not to submit any information which they do not have the copyright of or of which they have transferred the copyrights to a third party.
Contents on WebmedCentral are purely for biomedical researchers and scientists. They are not meant to cater to the needs of an individual patient. The web portal or any content(s) therein is neither designed to support, nor replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her physician. Your use of the WebmedCentral site and its contents is entirely at your own risk. We do not take any responsibility for any harm that you may suffer or inflict on a third person by following the contents of this website.

Reviews
5 reviews posted so far

thank you. will consider in future studies... View more
Responded by Dr. Muddanahalli R Harish on 16 Jul 2012 05:12:54 AM GMT

variables will increase so mucosa is not considered here... View more
Responded by Dr. Muddanahalli R Harish on 16 Jul 2012 05:11:32 AM GMT

Cutaneous Manifestations in Chronic Renal Failure Patients on Hemodialysis
Posted by Anonymous Reviewer on 16 Jun 2012 01:46:44 AM GMT

thank you... View more
Responded by Dr. Muddanahalli R Harish on 16 Jul 2012 05:09:17 AM GMT

thank you... View more
Responded by Dr. Muddanahalli R Harish on 16 Jul 2012 05:09:01 AM GMT

thank you... View more
Responded by Dr. Muddanahalli R Harish on 16 Jul 2012 05:08:48 AM GMT

Comments
0 comments posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.

 

Author Comments
0 comments posted so far

 

What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
Where
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)