My opinion
 

By Dr. Deepak Gupta
Corresponding Author Dr. Deepak Gupta
Self, - United States of America
Submitting Author Dr. Deepak Gupta
ECONOMICS OF MEDICINE

First Victim, Second Victim, Third Victim

Gupta D. Can Adverse Correctional Experiences Lead To Third Victim Syndrome?. WebmedCentral ECONOMICS OF MEDICINE 2021;12(12):WMC005749

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
No
Submitted on: 06 Dec 2021 01:04:29 AM GMT
Published on: 20 Dec 2021 05:03:55 AM GMT

My opinion


We talk about the first victim and the second victim syndrome [1-5]. However, we must also look into the third victim. The third victim may be fictional entities like corporations, towns, communities, societies and nations. However, much before the final step taken by these fictional entities to dissolve themselves under the relentless pressures of being the third victims [6], real people depending on them to survive variably suffer when the third victims are suffering. Yuval Harari may say that fictional entities cannot suffer [7-8], and he may be right that these fictional entities may not suffer per se except that they can just cease to exist after dissolution. However, their victimization as the third victims may leave real people suffering in its wake much before the actual dissolution of these fictional entities.

The immediately victimized third victims may be the corporations but the victimization effects do not cease to exist just at them where-after the victimization percolates into towns of people they serve and to nations of people they belong. Eventually, societies and environments become the far-removed third victim called humanity trotting globally and matrix forcing existence [9].

Therefore, whenever over-litigating, over-regulating and over-charging, the first victim, the second victim and the third victim eventually encompass the litigators who over-litigate, the regulators who over-regulate, and the chargers who over-charge because over-litigating, over-regulating and over-charging eventually lead to evolution of ghosts out of unsustainable vibrant and alive towns, communities, societies and nations [10-12] to which these litigators, regulators and chargers themselves belong. Each victimization that leads to new litigation, each litigation that leads to new regulation, and each regulation that leads to new charge eventually leads to new improvement per se that helps some things while harming other things. Thereafter, the cycle starts again [13], and it goes on and on because existence in problematic matrix is and remains unresolvable without nothingness.

The bottom-line is that, just like positive stress to tolerable stress becoming toxic stress to evolve adverse childhood experiences [14-15], there is a thin blurred timeline when positive litigation, positive regulation and positive charging cross over tolerable litigation, tolerable regulation and tolerable charging to become toxic litigation, toxic regulation and toxic charging inducing adverse correctional experiences for the third victims secondary to global humanity's maladapted responses to the first victims and the second victims.

Reference(s)


  1. Quick Safety Issue 39: Supporting second victims. https://www.jointcommission.org/resources/new s-and-multimedia/newsletters/newsletters/quick-safety/quick-safety-issue-39-supporting-second-victim s/
  2. Deployment of a Second Victim Peer Support Program: A Replication Study. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl es/PMC6132481/  
  3. Second Victim Syndrome. https://www.emra .org/books/emra-wellness-guide/ch-8.-second-victim-syndrome/
  4. Second victims in health care: current perspectives. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl es/PMC6697646/
  5. The Second Victim Phenomenon: A Harsh Reality of Health Care Professions. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/perspective/second-victim-phenomenon-harsh-reality-health-care-professio ns
  6. Closing a corporation. https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/closing-a-cor poration
  7. If a Story or Entity Can't Suffer, It's Fictional. https://podclips.com/ct/kCbsKi
  8. Yuval Noah Harari on Imagined Realities. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zen-m0rMp4I
  9. Facts about the climate emergency. https://www. unep.org/explore-topics/climate-action/facts-about-climate-emergency
  10. The Collapse of Lehman Brothers: A Case Study. https://www.i nvestopedia.com/articles/economics/09/lehman-brothers-collapse.asp
  11. The Abandonment of Small Cities in the Rust Belt. https://www.industryweek.com/talent/article/22028380/the-abandonment-of-small-cities-in-the -rust-belt
  12. The Collapse of the Soviet Union. https://history.state.go v/milestones/1989-1992/collapse-soviet-union
  13. The fall and rise of Native North America. https://www.cam .ac.uk/research/news/the-fall-and-rise-of-native-north-america
  14. Stress: How positive, tolerable, and toxic stress impact the developing brain. https://www.albertafamilywellness.o rg/what-we-know/stress
  15. Toxic Stress. https://developingchil d.harvard.edu/science/key-concepts/toxic-stress/

Source(s) of Funding


NOT APPLICABLE

Competing Interests


NOT APPLICABLE

Reviews
0 reviews posted so far

Comments
0 comments posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.

 

Author Comments
0 comments posted so far

 

What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
Where
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)