Research articles
 

By Dr. Jeewan S Prakash
Corresponding Author Dr. Jeewan S Prakash
CMC & Hospital, CMC & Hospital ,Ludhiana - India 141008
Submitting Author Dr. Jeewan S Prakash
ORTHOPAEDICS

: across knee , external fixation , distal femur fracture , proximal tibia fracture , knee dislocation

Prakash JS. A study on across knee external fixation in adults. WebmedCentral ORTHOPAEDICS 2022;13(3):WMC005758

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
No
Submitted on: 17 Mar 2022 06:01:08 AM GMT
Published on: 22 Mar 2022 07:32:36 AM GMT

Abstract


External fixation is a commonly performed orthopedic surgical intervention . Across knee external fixation is carried out for  various indications related to bones , joints and soft tissues . We report our observations on 41 across knee external fixators applied on 39 patients studied over a period of 4 years .

Introduction


A  joint spanning external fixator plays an equally  important  role in management of acute trauma befitting a  part of damage control  orthopedics as well as  for multiple non traumatic conditions involving the lower limb/s . Across knee external fixation is mostly done fixing the femur and the tibia , with or without  limited internal fixation simultaneously .  

Review


Francois  Malgaigne  ( 1840’s )  is credited for the earliest form of modern external fixator  , a claw like device used  for management of patellar fractures . Parkhill  (1894 USA)   , Lambotte ( a Belgian surgeon 1902) , and  Hoffman ( 1938 Switzerland)   are noteworthy in the  ensuing  evolution of external fixation systems . In 1950’s Ilizarov (USSR)  and  others were  instrumental in  the development of ring or circular external  fixators which they successfully utilized for distraction osteoneogenesis and other indications . External fixators have been applied on tibia , femur and other  bones as well as across joints like knee , ankle , wrist etc. [  5, 12 , 8 ].

Materials & methods


In a study carried out between January 2012 and December 2015 , 39 patients with 41  across knee external fixators [ 2 patients with  bilateral fixators ] were selected on fulfillment of inclusion and exclusion criteria cleared / approved by research , ethics and other related committees  . Inclusion criterion was patients 18 years or older. Exclusion criteria : patients with neurological deficits , patients with implants in situ due to earlier surgery .

Observations


Initial enrolment included 45 patients with 47 across knee fixators over 4 years  but 39 patients with 41 external fixations could be followed up until end of study : 6 patients were lost to follow up for various reasons . Age ranged from 18 to 65 years : 37 males , 02 females . Mean age was 37.36 years . Male female ratio 18.5 : 1 . Majority 10 patients were between 41 & 50 years [ 25.64% , 10 males ] , followed by 9 between 21 & 30 [ 23.08% , 8 males , 1 female ] together accounting for nearly half of all the patients. The other female was in her fourth decade.

In 39 patients the commonest mode of injury was road traffic accidents [ RTA n = 34 , 87.1%] , followed by industrial accidents [ n= 3 , 7.89% ]. 2 patients had flexion deformity of knee.  RTA and industrial accidents caused 44 fractures : 20 femur fractures , 24 tibia fractures and 1 knee dislocation . 25 fractures [ 56.8% ] were open , 19 [ 43.2% ] closed . Of open fractures  21 [ 84% ] were Gustilo Anderson III B , followed by 8% III C  and  4% III A & II [1] each . According to AO classification : of 20 femur fractures  1 – 32 , 19 – 33 : of 24 tibia fractures 16 – 41  &  8 - 42 .

Indications  :  36 patients were managed with across knee external fixation for 44 fractures  on 38 limbs . 1 patient needed it after reduction of dislocation of knee . In 2 patients it was indicated for flexion deformity of knee . Majority 24 of  37 [ 64.8%]  patients  had across knee fixation within 2 days . 2 patients with flexion deformity were taken up 1 day after admission .The rest  were operated within 1 week or later.  Mean time for external fixation following injury was 2.65 days . Out of 39  across knee fixators in males 18 were applied on left side , 21 on right . Both female patients had left side involvement . In  2 males bilateral lower limb fixators were applied.

 1 ring and 40 tubular fixators were applied . 36 fixators were unilateral biplanar with Schanz pins inserted laterally on femur and anteriorly /anteromedially  on tibia . 4 fixators were bilateral uniplanar  spanning both knee and ankle joints with Denham pins  through calcaneum . 163 Schanz screws were applied on 40 tubular fixators . 8  pins passed through open wounds . Majority 80% fixators [ 32/40 ] had 2 pins each in femur and tibia . 9 K wires were inserted in 1 Ilizarov fixator . None of the K wires was through wound . 8 out of 38 knees were stabilized initially with limited internal fixation with K wires and /or cannulated  screws .

All patients were started on physiotherapy from first post op day , made to stand and ambulate within 1st week  . Post fixator removal all were started  on knee range of motion and muscle strengthening exercises .

 

Results & Analysis


39 adult patients underwent 41 across knee external fixation on 41 lower limbs for 44 fractures of femur and tibia , 1 dislocated knee  , and knee flexion deformity – 2 . They were followed up for an average period of  43.8  weeks [ 0.84 year ] : range  13 – 104+ weeks .

All 44 fractures  united , fracture union 100% . Average union time was 25.75 weeks .  Mal union was recorded in 5 out of  36 [ 13.88% ]  patients. Delayed union was seen in 5 out of 44 fractures [ 11.36% ] in 5 of 36 [ 13.88% ]  patients .

Pin tract infection [ PTI ] was seen in 16 Schanz pins out of 163 , 7 passed through wounds . 9 screws had grade I infection , 6 – grade II : these could be controlled by better pin tract care and / or local curettage and oral antibiotics . 1 screw had grade III infection with purulent discharge in 9th week , fixator was  removed .  Pin wise PTI  was 9.82% [16/163]  observed in 11 fixators of 40  tubular fixators [ 27.5%  fixator wise PTI ] in 11 of 38 patients [ 28.95% patient wise PTI ]. In 1 patient with 1 ring fixator with 9 K wires no infection was seen.

Compartment syndrome was observed in 2 out of 41 [ 4.88% ] limbs involved in 2 of 39 [5.13%] patients . Knee flexion contracture  was observed in 2 out of 41 [ 4.88% ] limbs involved in 2 of 39 [ 5.13% ] patients . None had deep vein thrombosis , osteomyelitis , septic arthritis ,  haematoma formation around knee in any affected limb .

 Mean ROM of knee following fixator removal was 74.76 +/-25.79  degree  ranging from 05 to 130 degree.

Discussion


In the  past decades starting with Marsh et al 1995 [ 6 ] to Ganjwala et al 2014 [ 2 ] , 10 studies reported on from  4 patients with 5 across knee  fixators to 75 patients with 75 fixators [ 5 ]  for different indications . Park et al 2011 [ 7 ] recorded mean age of 17.5 years , other studies mostly above 40 and 50 years , in comparison to our 37.36 yrs..  Majority studies report higher male to female ratios e.g. 1.17: 1 ,1.29: 1,3.7: 1 to 5: 1 [ 1 , 10  ] to the present 18.5 : 1 . Studies reported indications : tibial plateau fractures , distal femur fractures  , arthrodesis , HTO non union , deformity correction [  6 , 1 , 11 , 3 , 2  ] . Some studies reported greater number of closed fractures [ 10 , 5 , 9  ] others open fractures [ 4   ] in comparison to the present 56.8% open and 43.2% closed fractures . 84% open fractures were grade IIIB , 8% grade IIIC .  Duration  of    fixators  reported in different studies range from 5.5 weeks to 26 weeks in comparison to the present study’s 10 weeks on an average , range  8 to 27.5 weeks [ 1 , 7 ]. Range of fracture union time in studies varies from 3 to 5.8 months  [ 9 , 1 ] . In the present study average union  time was 5.92 months  .

Pin tract infections have ranged from 6.25% to 100 % of patients in studies [ 4 , 7 ] while in the present series PTI was 9.82% pin wise , 27.5% fixator wise and 28.95%  patient wise . Incidence of mal union was 11.36%   in comparison to 14%  to  20% in other studies [ 6 , 9 ] . There was no nonunion but 11.36%  [ n =5 ] delayed union was observed which was one of the contributory factors  in the higher average of fracture union time .

Knee ROM reported in different studies averaged from 85 degrees to 126.9 . By the time of last follow up the present study witnessed an average range of movement of 74.76 . It is noteworthy that 57% fractures were open , 92% of them grade III B & III C with  soft as well as hard tissue loss/es in a number of  victims  .  ROM was noted to be  less with increasing grade of compound fractures , the longer period of delay in external fixation , and the longer the fixator remained on the limb/s across the joint/s .

Conclusion


Based on  correlation analysis   knee ROM  was found to  be inversely related  to severity of open fractures , time of fixator application since injury , and duration of fixator prior to removal.

Bibliography


01 . Fazal  A , Michael S  : Treatment of isolated complex distal femoral fractures by external fixation : Injury : 2000 : 31  : 3 :139 - 145

02 . Ganjwala D , Shah S , Shah S : Ensuring precision in lower limb deformity correction through a combination of temporary external fixation  followed by internal fixation:  results of a retrospective study : Indian J Ortho : 2014 : 48 [5] : 495 - 500

03 . Gillooly J , Tilkeridis K, Simonis R , Monsell F : The treatment of high tibial osteotomy non union with Ilizarov external fixator : Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. : 2012 :7 [2] : 93 - 97 

04 . Hutson J , Zych G : Treatment of comminuted intraarticular distal femur fractures  with limited internal and external tensioned wire fixation : J Ortho Trauma : 2000 :14 [6]: 405 - 13

05 . Mankar SH , Golhar AV , Shukla M , Badwaik PS , Faizan M , Kalkotwar S : Outcome of complex tibial plateau fractures treated with external fixator : Indian J Ortho : 2012 :46 [5]: 570-74

 

06 . Marsh J , Smith S , Do TT : External fixation and limited internal fixation for complex fractures of tibial plateau : J Bone Joint Surg Am : 1995 :77 [5] : 661-73

07 . Park H , Kim H , Park H , Lee K : Limb angular deformity correction using Dyna ATC : surgical technique , calculation method and clinical outcome :Yonsei Med J : 2011:52 [5] : 818 - 30

08 . Prakash  J S , David  V , Bhatty S , Deane A , Mahajan A : Across wrist external fixation for distal radius fractures in adults : WebmedCentral Orthopedics : 2015 : 6 [8] WMC004959

09 . Ramos T , Ekholm C , Eriksson B , Karlsson J , Nistor L : The Ilizarov external fixator – a useful alternative for the treatment  of proximal tibial fractures . A prospective  observational study of 30 consecutive patients : BMC Musculoskeletal disorders : 2013 :

14:11

10 . Ranatunga I R , Thirumal M  : Treatment of tibial plateau Schatzker type VI  fracture  with Ilizarov  technique using ring external fixators across the knee  : A retrospective  review : Malays  Orthop J : 2010 : 3 : [2] : 34 -9

11 . Riouallan G , Molina G , Mansour C , Nordin  J  : An original knee arthrodesis technique combining external fixator with Steinman pins direct fixation : Orthop  Traumatol  Surg  Res . : 2009 : 95 : [4] : 272 - 7

 

12 . Zlowodzki  M , Prakash  J S , Aggarwal N K : External Fixation of Complex Femoral Fractures : International  Orthopedics :  2007 : 31 [3]: 409- 413

Source(s) of Funding


Self funded . No external  assistance .

Competing Interests


None .

Reviews
0 reviews posted so far

Comments
0 comments posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.

 

Author Comments
0 comments posted so far

 

What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
Where
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)