My opinion
 

By Dr. Amit Jain , Dr. Deepak Gupta
Corresponding Author Dr. Deepak Gupta
Wayne State University, - United States of America
Submitting Author Dr. Deepak Gupta
Other Authors Dr. Amit Jain
Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Anesthesiology, - United States of America

ANAESTHESIA

Awake GlideScope Intubation, Topical Anesthesia

Jain A, Gupta D. Technique For Awake GlideScope Intubation Under Topical Anesthesia. WebmedCentral ANAESTHESIA 2023;14(1):WMC005815

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
No
Submitted on: 11 Jan 2023 10:51:29 PM GMT
Published on: 15 Jan 2023 04:36:12 AM GMT

My opinion


For predicted difficult airway intubation, awake fiberoptic intubation under topical anesthesia has been there for quite a while especially when prediction is difficult-to-impossible to safely intubate trachea under any level of sedation with or without loss of spontaneous breathing. Except for awake fiberoptic intubation under topical anesthesia, fiberoptic intubation has largely gotten replaced with videolaryngoscopy like GlideScope in current practice of anesthesia when dealing with predicted difficult airway intubation [1-2]. However, awake GlideScope intubation under topical anesthesia is rarely used if ever but GlideScope can come in handy considering that currently anesthesia providers are more frequently trained to use GlideScope and may feel uncomfortable using fiberoptic scope for awake airway intubation. Therefore, it may be better to train current anesthesia providers to use GlideScope for awake airway intubation rather than prematurely calling for otorhinolaryngologists for awake fiberoptic intubation or even tracheostomy under local anesthesia.

 

Topical anesthesia technique for awake GlideScope may be same as topical anesthesia technique for awake fiberoptic intubation. The personal preference is following:

 

In the preoperative area:

  • Intravenous glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg
  • 3ml 4% lidocaine (120mg) [3] for nebulization via simple oxygen mask
  • 3ml 4% lidocaine (120mg) for oral gargling

 

In the operating/procedure room:

  • Standard anesthesia monitoring
  • Low Fowler’s position with patient’s head inclined up at 15-30 degrees [4]
  • Nasal cannula for oxygen supplementation with continuous end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring [5]
  • Intradermal local anesthesia of skin over cricothyroid membrane to allow transtracheal delivery of 3ml 2% lidocaine (60mg) [6] via 22G hypodermic needle connected to 5ml syringe to aspirate air as confirmation of intratracheal position of 22G hypodermic needle
  • 5-10 minutes later, slow insertion of GlideScope blade followed by additional aerosol spraying of oropharynx and laryngopharynx with benzocaine 20% [7]
  • Well-lubricated endotracheal tube over rigid stylet railroaded into spontaneously breathing awake patient’s trachea
  • Connection to anesthesia circuit and ventilator so as to reconfirm intratracheal placement of endotracheal tube with continuous end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring before administration of intravenous plus inhalational anesthesia with or without muscle relaxants thereafter

 

Summarily, anesthesia providers trained on GlideScope day in, day out should be trained in awake GlideScope intubation because learning trajectory and learning curve of awake fiberoptic intubation may have become steeper in current times considering that anesthesia providers’ exposure to fiberoptic intubations may have bottomed out since easier use of GlideScope among predicted difficult airway intubation scenarios may have taken the hold of anesthesiology as a specialty.   

Reference(s)


  1. The incidence of awake tracheal intubation in anesthetic practice is decreasing: a historical cohort study of the years 2014–2020 at a single tertiary care institution https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9607858/
  2. Fibreoptic intubation in airway management: a review article https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6441687/
  3. Lidocaine Topical 4% Solution https://www.ashp.org/drug-shortages/current-shortages/drug-shortage-detail.aspx?id=33
  4. What are the types of Fowler's position? https://www.steris.com/healthcare/knowledge-center/surgical-equipment/fowlers-position-guide
  5. EtCO2/O2 Adult End Tidal Sampling Nasal Cannulas https://www.sun-med.com/product/etco2-o2-adult-capnography-nasal-cannulas/
  6. Maximum Recommended Doses and Duration of Local Anesthetics https://medicine.uiowa.edu/iowaprotocols/maximum-recommended-doses-and-duration-local-anesthetics
  7. benzocaine 20 % mucosal aerosol spray https://healthy.kaiserpermanente.org/health-wellness/drug-encyclopedia/drug.benzocaine-20-mucosal-ae rosol-spray.446780

Source(s) of Funding


NOT APPLICABLE

Competing Interests


NOT APPLICABLE

Reviews
0 reviews posted so far

Comments
0 comments posted so far

Please use this functionality to flag objectionable, inappropriate, inaccurate, and offensive content to WebmedCentral Team and the authors.

 

Author Comments
0 comments posted so far

 

What is article Popularity?

Article popularity is calculated by considering the scores: age of the article
Popularity = (P - 1) / (T + 2)^1.5
Where
P : points is the sum of individual scores, which includes article Views, Downloads, Reviews, Comments and their weightage

Scores   Weightage
Views Points X 1
Download Points X 2
Comment Points X 5
Review Points X 10
Points= sum(Views Points + Download Points + Comment Points + Review Points)
T : time since submission in hours.
P is subtracted by 1 to negate submitter's vote.
Age factor is (time since submission in hours plus two) to the power of 1.5.factor.

How Article Quality Works?

For each article Authors/Readers, Reviewers and WMC Editors can review/rate the articles. These ratings are used to determine Feedback Scores.

In most cases, article receive ratings in the range of 0 to 10. We calculate average of all the ratings and consider it as article quality.

Quality=Average(Authors/Readers Ratings + Reviewers Ratings + WMC Editor Ratings)