Submited on: 17 Dec 2011 05:56:47 PM GMT
Published on: 18 Dec 2011 07:15:00 AM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This paper deals with the current problems related to Staphylococcus and its resistant nature, its very informative and deals with few antibiotics working on that and its side effects. Which will be useful for various students working on that lines.

  • Competing interests:
    Good paper, informative, guide regarding the side effects and useful for dietitians also.
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I am working on Indian Medicinal Plants and their activity against MDRS so as the author is working on antibiotics and i am working on active extracts and bioactives as antibiotics.

  • How to cite:  Menghani E .Choices of Antibiotics for MRSA Infection in Malaysia[Review of the article 'Choices of Antibiotics for MRSA Infection in Malaysia ' by Harun S].WebmedCentral 2011;2(12):WMCRW001283
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse