Submited on: 16 Dec 2011 10:33:51 PM GMT
Published on: 17 Dec 2011 02:31:42 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? Yes
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? No
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? No
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The article has a modest scientific mean. According to authors the data obtained" give rise the attention for importance for  continuous monitoring of AIV NA genetic changes for both diagnosis and treatment before its transmission to human " Everything is obscure and not clear! Authors should explain to readers how continuous monitoring will specifically help to diagnosis and treatment ! Additional Figs  are unnecessary, the list of references should be truncated.

  • Competing interests:
    I have no any competing interest because I am working in other fields.
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    No experiance

  • How to cite:  Shukolyukov A.Molecular Study on Avian Viral Influenza (h5n1) Neuraminidase Gene in Egypt[Review of the article ' Molecular Study On Avian Viral Influenza (h5n1) Neuraminidase Gene In Egypt ' by Awad E].WebmedCentral 2011;2(12):WMCRW001287
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse