WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Submited on: 15 Nov 2010 09:45:18 PM GMT

Published on: 16 Nov 2010 06:13:19 PM GMT

Posted by Mr. John B Allen on 17 Dec 2010 12:13:18 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	No
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
I would provide a summary table of the findings on the interviews. This is an important piece of work which begins to look at natural helper systems following a disaster and their response as a result of being a natural helper.
Competing interests:
None
Invited by the author to review this article? :
Yes
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
Yes
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

Expertise and previously published on outreach and engagement activities. Wrote the unpublished manuscript referenced in the article.
How to cite: Allen J B.Original contribution looking at Natural Helping System Response to disaster[Review of the article 'Natural Helpers After The Terrorist Attacks Of September 11 ' by Pruitt D].WebmedCentral 2010;1(12):WMCRW00256

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse