Submited on: 09 Oct 2010 01:58:28 AM GMT
Published on: 09 Oct 2010 06:08:52 AM GMT
 
review of paper
Posted by Dr. Marmura MJ on 27 Feb 2011 09:19:46 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? No
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? Yes
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    A well-written paper with good references which pertain to the subject. My main objection to this case report is that this is not Paroxysmal hemicrania. PH is unilateral (although the authors note side-switching can occur) and responds absolutely to indocin. Although there is discussion of “hemicrania continua vera” and “non-vera” which means a constant unilateral headache with autonomic symptoms which resembles hemicrania continua but does not respond to indocin. Most of the time this ends up being migraine. (leone, cephalagia, epidemiology of fixed unilateral headaches). There is no such controversy with PH. If a patient does not respond to indocin it is considered atypical and a search for a secondary cause becomes even more important.

     

    I might suggest an alteranative diagnosis. This is an elderly patient with no known GI problems and bilateral headaches after eating, a high ESR and hx of PMR. Indocin was not effective but a long course of steroids was. Although the temporal artery biopsy was negative, this does not always rule out TA. Skip lesions are common in TA so the false negative rate of biopsies is unfortunately high. Poller DN, van Wyk Q, Jeffrey MJ. J Clin Pathol. 2000 Feb;53(2):137-9. I suspect TA is the likely diagnosis, and the pain with eating is from jaw claudication.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    Yes
  • References:
    Hemicrania continua: who responds to indomethacin? Marmura MJ, Silberstein SD, Gupta M. Cephalalgia. 2009 Mar;29(3):300-7.
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Expert in the treatment of headache disorders well published on the subject.

  • How to cite:  MJ M .review of paper[Review of the article 'Gastroenteric-induced Bilateral Paroxysmal Hemicrania ' by Jacome D].WebmedCentral 2011;2(2):WMCRW00519
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse