WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Submited on: 22 Sep 2010 05:54:09 PM GMT

Published on: 22 Sep 2010 07:21:44 PM GMT

Posted by Prof. Syed A Gilani on 27 Mar 2011 04:30:11 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Partly
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	No
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	No
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	Yes
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	No
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
The authors have choosen a good topic for publication and its a nice contribution to the literature.It seems to need more details in discussion.As a whole it is a good article.
Competing interests:
nil
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

15 years
How to cite: Gilani S A.does uterine artery doppler or copper intrauterine device location by three dimensional transvaginal ultrasound correlates with clinical symptoms[Review of the article 'Does Uterine Artery Doppler or Copper Intrauterine Device Location by Three Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound Correlates with Clinical Symptoms? ' by Seliem B].WebmedCentral 2011;2(3):WMCRW00630

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse