Submited on: 02 Dec 2011 05:32:08 PM GMT
Published on: 03 Dec 2011 08:05:24 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Title: A word is missing(underlined). The influence of

    Abstract: Under methods, spelling of Gardnerella is wrong. Under results, nothing is said about educational status which is the focus of the study.

    Introduction: A word is missing in line 10. Cervical cytology has been found to be very helpful. See underlined.

    Materials/Methods: Line 14 is an incomplete sentence.

  • Competing interests:
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:


  • How to cite:  Ugboma H A.The influence of educational status on genital tract infections[Review of the article 'The Influence Educational Status on Genital Tract Infections ' by Nggada H].WebmedCentral 2011;2(12):WMCRW001223
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse