Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?
Yes
2
Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?
Yes
3
Is this a new and original contribution?
No
4
Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?
Yes
5
Are structure and length satisfactory?
Yes
6
Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?
No
7
Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?
No
8
Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?
Yes
9
Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?
Yes
10
Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?
Yes
11
Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?
Yes
Other Comments:
This is a detailed and complete review article.
Competing interests: no
Invited by the author to review this article? : No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
Illustrations and tables not applicable.
I have neen practising urology for more than 20 years.
How to cite: Odey J O.Malignancy after Renal transplantation: A review of the literature[Review of the article 'Malignancy after Renal transplantation: A review of the literature ' by Al- Hammadi A].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001754
This is a detailed and complete review article.
no
No
No
None
Illustrations and tables not applicable.
I have neen practising urology for more than 20 years.