Submited on: 25 Mar 2012 11:26:25 AM GMT
Published on: 26 Mar 2012 12:39:25 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This is a detailed and complete review article.

  • Competing interests:
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Illustrations and tables not applicable.

    I have neen practising urology for more than 20 years.

  • How to cite:  Odey J O.Malignancy after Renal transplantation: A review of the literature[Review of the article 'Malignancy after Renal transplantation: A review of the literature ' by Al- Hammadi A].WebmedCentral 2012;3(4):WMCRW001754
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse