Submited on: 20 Sep 2010 04:53:26 AM GMT
Published on: 20 Sep 2010 04:28:28 PM GMT
Critical Review on HLH
Posted by Prof. Luis Marcelo A Camargo on 14 Dec 2011 05:05:44 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    Very interesting and original. Of extreme importance for MD alert.

  • Competing interests:
    No competing interest
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
  • References:
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    MD, infectology and tropical disease. Professor of the Dept. of Parasitology of the University of S.Paulo-Brazil. In head of the University outpatient clinic in Rondônia, Amazônia, Brazil

  • How to cite:  Camargo L A.Critical Review on HLH[Review of the article 'Adult Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis: A 25-Year Experience at a Tertiary Care Hospital ' by Masoodi Z].WebmedCentral 2011;2(12):WMCRW001248
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse