WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Submited on: 11 Jan 2012 08:07:16 PM GMT

Published on: 12 Jan 2012 07:34:49 AM GMT

Posted by Dr. Yaroslav Winter on 15 Jan 2012 08:51:01 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
approved
Competing interests:
None
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
Yes
References:
Epifanov Y, Back T. Oculosympathetic paratrigeminal paralysis with isolated v2 involvement in carotid artery dissection. Arch Neurol. 2007 Mar;64(3):448-9.
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

Neurology
How to cite: Winter Y .Retrospective Study of Carotid Artery Ultrasonography [Review of the article 'Retrospective Study of a Series of 512 Cases of Carotid Artery Ultrasonography ' by Vyshka G].WebmedCentral 2012;3(1):WMCRW001392

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse