WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Submited on: 17 Feb 2012 09:50:50 AM GMT

Published on: 17 Feb 2012 12:27:30 PM GMT

Posted by Dr. Neriyana S Satish on 21 Feb 2012 07:48:37 AM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	No
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	No
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
The airticle is thought provoking. But I have few questions which might open up this article.

1. We do not have convincing proof for existence of Aliens.

2. We do not have proof to show that there technology is superior than ours.

3. Electro-Magnetic effects are very minimal on the brain because even a new born undergoes an MRI scan.

4. Telepathy itself is a function of consciousness as no one can communicate with a comatose or sleeping person Via telepathically.
Competing interests:
No
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

Published articles in international and national journals both on hypothesis and RCT studies.
How to cite: Satish N S.Review on Alien communication by telepathic mode[Review of the article 'Alien Communication: A Plausible Telepathic Mode ' by Jaseja B].WebmedCentral 2012;3(2):WMCRW001513

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse