Submited on: 25 Dec 2011 07:43:25 AM GMT
Published on: 26 Dec 2011 09:56:49 AM GMT
 
An Overveiw On Fast Dissolving Tablet
Posted by Dr. Khushwant S Yadav on 12 Mar 2012 03:15:47 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? No
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? No
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? No
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? Yes
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? Yes
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? No
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? No
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? No
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? No
  • Other Comments:

    The above review article does not add to any new information to the scientific comminity.

    It is copied form some of the previously published (that too which are open access) reviews/papers.

     

    The language used is inappropriate.

    There are lots of grammatical mistakes.

     

    The authors are not clear whether they are writing a review or research.

     

    Tables are copied and are not informative.

     

    Its not their own work.

     

    Information on ICH stability studies is WRONG. kindly check your information.

     

    In Vivo Disintegration Test: this is also wrong. How can in vivo be done in vitro?

     

    Publishers should not publish such work.

  • Competing interests:
    No
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    References are properly cited. There is no formatting.
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Experience on this review:

     

    It a very bad experience.

    I strongly wish the Webmedcentral team atleast have a look at the article and briefly review it for 2-3 days AT LEAST CHECK it for Plagiarism.

  • How to cite:  Yadav K S.An Overveiw On Fast Dissolving Tablet[Review of the article 'An Overveiw On Fast Dissolving Tablet ' by Singla R].WebmedCentral 2012;3(3):WMCRW001579
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse
 
Review response
Posted by Dr. Oliver Grundmann on 12 Mar 2012 01:33:17 PM GMT

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? No
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? No
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    The review on fast-dissolving tablets submitted by Patwa and others highlights an important and increasing area of research in the formulation of oral drug delivery. The authors describe the various aspects of current and future techniques for fast-dissolving oral tablets succinctly. The diction and formatting will require some revisions - some sentences are not well phrased and should be rewritten.

    Furthermore, adequate reference formatting is required - please do not include references in the headers and add references to the tables where appropriate so readers can better access the information provided.

    Overall an interesting topic that deserves publication.

  • Competing interests:
    No conflits of interest to declare
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    Working as a pharmacist and teaching pharmacy to pharmacy and graduate students

  • How to cite:  Grundmann O .Review response[Review of the article 'An Overveiw On Fast Dissolving Tablet ' by Singla R].WebmedCentral 2012;3(3):WMCRW001578
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse