WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Submited on: 14 Jun 2011 07:23:25 PM GMT

Published on: 15 Jun 2011 04:00:46 PM GMT

Shoulder Arthroplasty

Posted by Dr. Arndt P Schulz on 27 Mar 2012 06:52:51 AM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	No
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	No
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	No
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
A very interesting summary of current concepts in shoulder arthroplasty
Competing interests:
none
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

Orthopaedic Surgeon
How to cite: Schulz A P.Shoulder Arthroplasty[Review of the article 'Shoulder Arthroplasty: Pioneers, Choices and Controversy ' by Johnson L].WebmedCentral 2012;3(3):WMCRW001623

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse