Submited on: 16 Jan 2011 07:34:20 AM GMT
Published on: 18 Jan 2011 08:26:48 PM GMT
 

1 Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category? Yes
2 Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data? Yes
3 Is this a new and original contribution? Yes
4 Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic? Yes
5 Are structure and length satisfactory? Yes
6 Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience? No
7 Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts? No
8 Is the quality of the diction satisfactory? Yes
9 Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable? Yes
10 Are the references adequate and are they all necessary? Yes
11 Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative? Yes
  • Other Comments:

    This is a rare presentation and the authors have done a very complete review of the literature .

    The case is well written.

  • Competing interests:
    no
  • Invited by the author to review this article? :
    No
  • Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
    No
  • References:
    None
  • Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

    I am a urologist of more than 20 years experience

  • How to cite:  Odey J O.spontaneeous isolated dissecting infra-renal abdominal aorta in a 33 years old man, presenting as left loin to left iliac fossa pain and acute retention of urine:-a case report with a review of the the literature[Review of the article 'Spontaneous Isolated Dissecting Infra-renal Abdominal Aorta In A 33-years-old Man, Presenting As Left Loin To Left Iliac Fossa Pain And Acute Retention Of Urine: - A Case Report With A Review Of The Literature ' by Venyo A].WebmedCentral 2012;3(5):WMCRW001768
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Report abuse