WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Posted by Prof. Valcinir Bedin on 11 May 2012 06:50:37 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
It is very important to bring new ideas over the field of medicine education . It`s a new world and all tools have to be used to face its challanges.
Competing interests:
no
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

I have been a medicine professor for the last 30 years.
How to cite: Bedin V .The effectiveness of knowledge management in the map of medicine compared with Nonaka`s knowledge spiral[Review of the article 'The effectiveness of Knowledge Management in the Map of Medicine compared with Nonaka's Knowledge Spiral ' by Siddiqui M].WebmedCentral 2012;3(5):WMCRW001797

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse

Posted by Dr. Neriyana S Satish on 11 May 2012 03:45:58 AM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
good article
Competing interests:
no
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

Nil
How to cite: Satish N S.Review of The effectiveness of Knowledge Management in the Map of Medicine compared with Nonaka's Knowledge Spiral [Review of the article 'The effectiveness of Knowledge Management in the Map of Medicine compared with Nonaka's Knowledge Spiral ' by Siddiqui M].WebmedCentral 2012;3(5):WMCRW001794

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse