-
Reviews
Back to Reviews
Submited on: 02 Dec 2010 08:47:28 AM GMT
Published on: 03 Dec 2010 05:41:26 PM GMT
-
Other Comments:
Please include the references in the text
-
Competing interests:
No
-
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No -
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
-
References:
None -
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
yes
- How to cite: Bali K .comment[Review of the article 'Scaphoid Fractures- Anatomy And Diagnosis: A Systemic Review Of Literature ' by Kumar V].WebmedCentral 2010;1(12):WMCRW00195
Poor article.
The methodology employed is not explained. Subjects? inclusion/exclusion criteria for papers used? search strategy? How was evidence systematically reviewed? Assessment of included studies quality? Strengths and weaknesses of included studies? Further questions and research required?
This paper can not claim to be a systematic review as it currently reported. The quality of the conclusions can not be evaluated, thus its findings do not add to the current body of knowledge.
None
No
No
None
Orthopaedic junior doctor and sports scientist