Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?
Yes
2
Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?
Yes
3
Is this a new and original contribution?
Yes
4
Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?
Yes
5
Are structure and length satisfactory?
Yes
6
Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?
No
7
Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?
No
8
Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?
Yes
9
Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?
Yes
10
Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?
Yes
11
Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?
Yes
Other Comments:
I congratulate the authors on compiling an informative piece of work on GCT.....
Competing interests: No
Invited by the author to review this article? : No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: Yes
References:
Dhatt S, Tahasildar N, Tripathy S, BK S, Tamuk T. Excision And Endoprosthesis
Implantation For Proximal Femur Giant Cell Tumor . WebmedCentral ORTHOPAEDICS 2010;1(11):WMC001236
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
I have been treating bone tumors at my hospital set up and have keenly followed each of the cases...
How to cite: Tahasildar N . GCT of bones[Review of the article 'Giant Cell Tumor Of Bones: A Systemic Review Of Literature ' by Aggarwal S].WebmedCentral 2010;1(12):WMCRW00208
I congratulate the authors on compiling an informative piece of work on GCT.....
No
No
Yes
Dhatt S, Tahasildar N, Tripathy S, BK S, Tamuk T. Excision And Endoprosthesis Implantation For Proximal Femur Giant Cell Tumor . WebmedCentral ORTHOPAEDICS 2010;1(11):WMC001236
I have been treating bone tumors at my hospital set up and have keenly followed each of the cases...