WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Submited on: 05 Dec 2010 02:42:53 PM GMT

Published on: 07 Dec 2010 09:35:20 PM GMT

Osteosarcoma calcaneum

Posted by Dr. Naveen Tahasildar on 08 Dec 2010 03:03:58 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
A well written work on a rare tumor... I congratulate the authors on a quite informative article on osteosarcoma of calcaneum..
Competing interests:
No
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

Our orthopedic oncology unit deals with a good number of these cases though calcaneal osteosarcoma is a rare tumor....
How to cite: Tahasildar N .Osteosarcoma calcaneum[Review of the article 'Osteosarcoma Of Calcaneum A Case Series Of Rare Tumour Presenting A Diagnostic Dilemma ' by Bhagwat K].WebmedCentral 2010;1(12):WMCRW00210

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse