What are the main claims of the paper and how important are they?
BMI increase the risk of fibroid, it is important
Are these claims novel? If not, please specify papers that weaken the claims to the originality of this one.
Not novel and the auther referred to some other studies in the background and disscusion sections
Are the claims properly placed in the context of the previous literature?
Yes, it is included in the background and explained as anthropological outcomes
Do the results support the claims? If not, what other evidence is required?
Yes, but no randomisation used in choosing participants
If a protocol is provided, for example for a randomized controlled trial, are there any important deviations from it? If so, have the authors explained adequately why the deviations occurred?
No deviation and protocol was good but misses randomisation
Is the methodology valid? Does the paper offer enough details of its methodology that its experiments or its analyses could be reproduced?
Yes, but needs more details specially randomisation
Would any other experiments or additional information improve the paper? How much better would the paper be if this extra work was done, and how difficult would such work be to do, or to provide?
yes information of randomisation
Is this paper outstanding in its discipline? (For example, would you like to see this work presented in a seminar at your hospital or university? Do you feel these results need to be incorporated in your next general lecture on the subject?) If yes, what makes it outstanding? If not, why not?
No it is a good paper but not outstanding
Other Comments:
NA
Competing interests: None
Invited by the author to review this article? : No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: No
References:
No
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
Consultant and Author and Refferee of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
How to cite: Othman M .Good Retrospective Study[Review of the article 'Anthropometric Measures and the Risk of Developing leiomyoma in Ghana ' by Dapilah T].WebmedCentral 2012;3(10):WMCRW002289
BMI increase the risk of fibroid, it is important
Not novel and the auther referred to some other studies in the background and disscusion sections
Yes, it is included in the background and explained as anthropological outcomes
Yes, but no randomisation used in choosing participants
No deviation and protocol was good but misses randomisation
Yes, but needs more details specially randomisation
yes information of randomisation
No it is a good paper but not outstanding
NA
None
No
No
No
Consultant and Author and Refferee of Obstetrics and Gynaecology