Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?
Yes
2
Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?
Partly
3
Is this a new and original contribution?
Yes
4
Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?
Yes
5
Are structure and length satisfactory?
No
6
Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?
No
7
Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?
Yes
8
Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?
Yes
9
Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?
No
10
Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?
No
11
Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?
Yes
Other Comments:
The abstract does not cover the results
The Backgroubd is too lengthy and should be reduced to one paragraph only
The Discussion is missing
The references are too many
The references cited in the text must be changed to et al when there are more than two scientists
If References are numbered in the bibliograpgy they must be cited by nymbers in the text also otherwise the numbers should be removed and references mentioned alphabetically.
Tables are mentioned in the text but missing with the MS.
Results not presented as mentioned in the experimental design.
Competing interests: No
Invited by the author to review this article? : No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?: No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:
no experience on hysterectomies in human females
How to cite: Purohit G N.Recovery After Hysterectomy: A Year-Long Look[Review of the article 'Recovery After Hysterectomy: A Year-Long Look ' by Welz H].WebmedCentral 2011;2(3):WMCRW00608
The abstract does not cover the results
The Backgroubd is too lengthy and should be reduced to one paragraph only
The Discussion is missing
The references are too many
The references cited in the text must be changed to et al when there are more than two scientists
If References are numbered in the bibliograpgy they must be cited by nymbers in the text also otherwise the numbers should be removed and references mentioned alphabetically.
Tables are mentioned in the text but missing with the MS.
Results not presented as mentioned in the experimental design.
No
No
No
None
no experience on hysterectomies in human females