WebmedCentral.com :: Article Review View

Posted by Dr. Stephen R Manning on 17 May 2011 01:20:37 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	Yes
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
This is a nicely presented case with a good literature review.

Readers amy also be interested in Koh KH, Seo SW, Kim KM and Shim JS. Clinical and radiographic results of lateral condylar fracture of distal humerus in children. J Pediatr Orthop 2010 30(5) 425-9

Reference 15 Beaty - 1992. there is a more recent version, Beaty JH, Elbow fractures in children and adolescents. Inst Cours Lect 2003 52: 661-5
Competing interests:
no
Invited by the author to review this article? :
No
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

I have worked in trauma and orthopaedics for several years
How to cite: Manning S R.Review of Concomitant ulna shaft and humeral condylar fracture in a 6 year old child[Review of the article 'Concomitant Ulnar Shaft and Humeral Condylar Fracture in a 6 Year Old Child ' by Hafeez A].WebmedCentral 2011;2(5):WMCRW00754

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse

Thank you for the review. I have gone through the suggested references.
Responded by Dr. Nasir Muzaffar on 19 May 2011 12:37:24 PM

Posted by Dr. Taha Mir on 15 May 2011 03:08:29 PM GMT

1	Is the subject of the article within the scope of the subject category?	Yes
2	Are the interpretations / conclusions sound and justified by the data?	Yes
3	Is this a new and original contribution?	No
4	Does this paper exemplify an awareness of other research on the topic?	Yes
5	Are structure and length satisfactory?	Yes
6	Can you suggest brief additions or amendments or an introductory statement that will increase the value of this paper for an international audience?	No
7	Can you suggest any reductions in the paper, or deletions of parts?	No
8	Is the quality of the diction satisfactory?	Yes
9	Are the illustrations and tables necessary and acceptable?	Yes
10	Are the references adequate and are they all necessary?	Yes
11	Are the keywords and abstract or summary informative?	Yes

Other Comments:
such cases very rarely seen in literature, and worth presentation and publication.
Invited by the author to review this article? :
Yes
Have you previously published on this or a similar topic?:
No
References:
None
Experience and credentials in the specific area of science:

i have total of ten years experience in dealing with orthopaedic trauma cases, but i did not come across such case of ipsilateral lateral condyle fractue and ulnar shaft with such low energy trauma.
How to cite: Mir T .concomitant ulnar shaft and humeral condylar fracture in a 6 yr old child[Review of the article 'Concomitant Ulnar Shaft and Humeral Condylar Fracture in a 6 Year Old Child ' by Hafeez A].WebmedCentral 2011;2(5):WMCRW00744

Rating
Rating	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

Report abuse